A turn with a little 'attention to the vast sea of \u200b\u200binternet you can see easily that this is against a strong dose of disillusionment and mistrust in some sites (and in many forum), bordering on fear of the apocalypse. Species in what is often called - so I have to say a little 'vague and inappropriate - "counter" and that is often the most "brown" nihilists.
I believe that this negative energy, energy is totally wasted, but that's another discorso.Ciò that I would like instead is the positive side and "enlightened" of the coin (which come potrete immaginare andrò a criticare); quello che rappresenta sempre più l’elemento di "speranza" e fiducia tra i frequentatori della rete:
Le potenzialità informative della rete stessa e la sua capacità di divenire il più grande trampolino di lancio per una possibile "rivoluzione" nel "mondo degli umani"[sic].Internet come nuova rivoluzione non solo tecnica ma sociale,politica, umana, ed innanzi tutto informativa -come fu la stampa di Gutenberg nel XV secolo-.
Ma ciò che qui occorre fare per poter andare successivamente ad analizzare quali sono le vere capacità del mezzo ,qual’è la sua agilità nello sfuggire da quelli che sono i POTERI FORTI , vedere poi i suoi aspetti psicologici e sociali ,penso sia dare un senso al termine INFORMAZIONE nelle sue varie sfaccettature e soprattutto nel contesto del network.
Bisogna infatti opportunamente distinguere la sua capacità informativa da quella comunicativa e successivamente tra notizia - come input per la conoscenza degli eventi dell’attualità - e mero dato .
È infatti indubbio che internet sia il più ampio ,veloce e democratico sistema di comunicazione tra singoli individui. Ognuno può ,per necessità o voglia, infilarsi in qualche recondita maglia della rete per urlare il proprio pensiero (spesso dissenso). Se nel mondo reale spesso si è forced by a thousand circumstances force us to close in the joints that everyday life and gives us appicicarci tape to her mouth, in the World "track" we become in all newsboys, subversive, columnists, commentators, critics of every aspect of our existence: the rigor not given, to murder in Ohio through the maneuver erected in interest rates by the Bank Centrale.Questo sudden and universal exchange of views (almost) always free, unfiltered, has the effect of changing the perception that have on our surroundings and to broaden awareness of how "the world works." But it is precisely
perceptions, subjective evaluations easily subject to error and distortion, and items you can detach from what is frequently the real , which does not always correspond to the opinion that it has the mass, not even the majority!.
Regarding the second aspect, the internet is an endless source of data of any kind: You can tell at a glance the depth of Lake Bracciano, the duration of the battle of Waterloo, the political system of Trinidad & Tobago, Earth-Saturn distance ... figures, distances, lengths, useful information on general culture and perhaps necessary, but basically NEUTRAL .
it gets more complicated when this it requires the user of the service is a real "News" with the capital "N":
that information key (and often controversial) nature of current, difficult to find yourself, that alone REALLY can change the choices of our friend "social actor" but can also affect its ideological education.
The fact is that the network is built - more than the media / information until recently considered - from a wealth of information, opinions, views, issues, considerations, points of view and, indeed, information (in generic and common sense now), finally, as hypertrophic. Why
the figure that comes closest to this medium is not the "Network" with its mesh more or less close but is rather a drain without a filter, and there is nothing but a dim consciousness and personal intellectual honesty, to act as screen that shows every day in front of the "sick of the keyboard."
Every good idea and to communicate, to express themselves, to exist, even in the form of bits, including the largest sciocchezza.E if the technology of the 'information' progress each year, month, day, giving us terabits of data ( every type and kind), making them potentially omniscient, man remains the same. An animal limited and weak, even intellectually.
Many argue that if holding one or two newspapers, an individual is facing always the same miserable news unable to raise the "bleating flock of ignorance", before, instead of a screen connected, this becomes the ability to be an unlimited, unrestricted comequasi becomes its ability to react to news that the assault .
You forget, however, that the critical sense of a man does not change depending on the means which consults, but capable of much more personal and other variables related to the history of this, such as cultural education, skills intellectuals life experience ... So the question
is always the same: how important perfect car if the driver is a low vision? The risk is half that given by our poor friend has to choose what to believe (ergo form a clear opinion of its reality) in a universe opposing and often conflicting information with each other. Because if it is true that the paper is limited in content and often narrow in the hands of powerful publishers, advertising and the old or new ideologies of the party is also true that those who takes the trouble to publish a story must take responsibility on their shoulders a considerable economic and image, and certainly not comparable to that of "flames" of information (or "controinformazione") esistenti su internet.
Direi che è il momento dell’esempio esplicativo, no?
Inventiamoci un argomento e dei protagonisti della rete TOTALMENTE immaginari.
Diciamo che su di un fronte on-line esista un creatore di blog,che chiameremo Impegnatissimo , deciso a difendere a spada tratta la Versione Ufficiale del 12 settembre 2002 . Quest’individuo dice talmente tante sciocchezze ma talmente tante sciocchezze (e di tale portata) che il suo blog è uno dei più visitati d’Italia e i suoi "fallaci" lavori di analisi e le sue tesi sono ripresi da diverse trasmissioni televisive nonché articoli giornalistici.
Dal lato opposto there is a webmaster from opposing views, which we call Marcuzzo , which attacks every three to two in every single statement of the thesis consists of the Truth. Sotiene of "enormity" as socks, but socks so that your site has thousands of members and hundreds of visitors daily, and his book (advertised in the fabric of space) has been snapped up.
We thus created two vast "coalition" with 2 unique perceptions of reality diametrically opposed argue that, paradoxically, both on pillars made of cardboard and personal opinions on virtually untested.
What is even more absurd is that, given the difficult reduction of the world making simple variable and often stylized monochrome, none of the two could hold the truth for all (I know it's not true but it's nice hope) long for, but both could be light years away from it. But let
matrix in least one of our owns the caballeros.
We are willing to accept that a population so large - such as to facilitate reduced to a half of those concerned (or trapped in the topic) - misled by the mere whim of a handful of "authors"? Then
What is the real responsibility for them, in front of their users if any site has been created out of nothing, nothing thrives in its responsibility for "editorial", lives in the void of anonymity and that nothing can go in without feeling the pinch of a public denial?
And once the initial application on which the whole matter is reduced:
What are the real capacity of the individual user in terms of: knowledge, critical thinking, willingness, time and real independence (we are aware of the routes required that many sites us to follow?) of the rapid growth of the 'interactive information?
To make sense of and a conclusion (that then it is not) in my speech that I can say is trivial, since it is floating in the sea of \u200b\u200bskepticism, is that the Internet is an extraordinary medium and then amplifies the general perception of historical and social situation in which we live. And as the catalyst and driving force of ' information (as seen broad concept) can only help - as it has always been in the history of the development of writing to optical recording via the fixed and movable type printing - to give a boost to the democratic process and individual and social emancipation.
But we must also consider the potential negative and deadly to half that hides in its infinity the germ of the annulment of detachment from reality and a more concrete awareness of the world ci circonda - attraverso dati che si annichiliscon 
o l’un l’altro- e nella sua apparente libertà la possibilità di un remoto e dissimulato controllo da parte di quelli che possono essere considerati i poteri forti dell’economia globalizzata.
Questo non voleva essere un elenco completo dei controversi aspetti che caratterizzano internet( quelli psico-sociali non sono stati trattati e quelli del monopolio mediatico appena accennati) ma spero che possa essere un valido spunto per estendere ed allo stesso tempo approfondire la discussione sul tema.
Gianluca Nichilista
---------------------
AGGIORNAMENTO
excuse the many mistakes of the first version, I tried to place a patch :-)
