Monday, March 22, 2010

Mongrammed Plastic Cups




Oggi ho letto un bel editoriale (come al solito) di Giovanni Sartori sul Corriere della Sera (" Donkeys and uneven", 22 / 3) which, by the squawking wriggling creepy newspaper on the elections, faces the problem of the progressive "illiteracy" of the Italian people. The figure is part dall'allarmante that 70% of Italians are returning an illiterate, unable to understand a text that has more complexity than that offered by the Yellow Pages. The problem, in addition to gravity in and of itself, gives a useful key for interpreting the spread of populism on the right (but not only) and its success turnout and lively squares mezz'Europa.

The problem does not seem to afflict only our increasingly decrepit boot, although in a a German magazine (can not remember the name, heck!) It turns out that Germany complains the same lack of young players, and even a high level of real illiterate, not even able to read the labels of the water. Sartori goes further, however, not limited pitiless analysis of the phenomenon, but finding "the" ultimate culprit (who joins with other accomplices, such as poor schooling and pedagogical novismo): refers to the development of technology ' information. It is she who has made all of us are unable to follow a logical thread of thought for more than two sentences, the hurried search for information are always new and ever more "Easily used", we have sacrificed the weight of reasoning and depth on the altar of multitasking.

Also this thesis does not taste the original, although, as pointed out Vaughan Bell in an article in State (and reported on International No. 837) that our ability to reflect and concentration had been considered endangered since dall'apparsa the press in 1455 (it refers to the same Sartori in his article), then after the problem has revived with the emergence of radio, television, cell phone text messages with their ... well, any appearance of anything that came out of all proportion to speed up our ability to transmit thoughts, words and knowledge, sound the alarm.

issues that I believe will materialize at this point are 2: 1-

is true what it claims Sartori?

2 - even supposing that what Sartori says is true, how to reconcile the much acclaimed rising power of citizens / users, due to the use of tools such as instant and free sharing web with stupidity "the sovereign people feared the political scientist just because of the use of these same means?

you declare immediately that the first question I can not give a definitive answer. The aforementioned article by Bell wanted to be a refutation of the theory also supported by Editoriale Corriere. As a double to bring the results of several studies (does not specify which) where it was argued that the Internet had a negative influence on our brains - unlike the TV-gloss and noting that, as always in history, technological advances have been welcomed, especially by the elderly population and therefore conservative, as an instrument of corruption of young minds. do not know if this is true, I claw and neurological research, sociological and psychological, that can not be in its infancy. What I can say from personal experience, is that my level of patience in the face of a written text has been reduced a lot, to almost disappear in the case of newspapers, which now reduces me to read only the page titles on-line; search engines, the wikienciclopedie, the multitude of opinions "cooked", they also filed a part of my passion for finding meaning in a text, spell checkers have freed us from the burden of ' education and grammar language tools fatigue of translation, inoltre, guardando non solo al mio caso, ho notato che la conoscenza è divenuta sempre più nozionistica e meno di spessore.

Rispondere alla seconda domanda, essendo questa orfana di una risposta alla prima, apparirebbe impresa un po’ ardua se non paradossale. Anche in questo caso galleggio nel dubbio. Mi limiterò ad osservare, come spesso in altre sedi ho fatto, che il web, con il suo potere di renderci tutti dei suoi creatori ( empowerment qualcuno lo definirebbe), ha moltiplicato le voci nel coro dell’informazione fino ad un livello incontrollabile, senza che un necessario meccanismo di controllo affidabile si sviluppasse per poter fare da filtro alla “messe mess "that flood the network (an interesting debate on the subject, about wikipedia, you can find him reading the article by Richard Waters, at the International 835).

So, how to build a valid opinion of the world around us if the person who "knows" has the same degree of respectability to those who "think they know"?

short, these are the dilemmas, which in turn opens more windows on several related issues.

I Like, stimulated by THAT ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS THAT YOU INTERNET USERS, ESPRIMESTE YOUR OPINION HERE, MAYBE GIVE AN ANSWER TO THE TWO BASIC QUESTIONS.

Gianluca Frattini

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Sorry Message Looks Like Spam Or Phish To Me Op



From "Corriere della sera", a unique history and amazing!
The heroic action of a warrant officer loyal to his duty ...






"Cops and Robbers ... Bike - The Bicycle Thief in action Thursday, Jan. 14, but with little luck. A Roman of 29 years, already known to police, was arrested for stealing a bicycle from a police sergeant of the company Parioli, free of duty. It 'happened by way of Silla: the sergeant was on leave when he noticed the man who was forcing the chain of a bicycle secured to a pole and it stuck. "
From" Corriere della sera "2010.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Beautiful Agony Clips Free

Israel could (and has the ability) to destroy the 'whole of Europe

Al-Quds (Jerusalem) - Pic. The Israeli military historian Martin Karfeld said that Israel could be forced to destroy the entire European continent using all kinds of weapons, including nuclear ones, if he felt his end near . He added that Israel views l'Europa un bersaglio ostile.

Queste dichiarazioni sono state rilasciate durante un'intervista al canale 7 della radio israeliana, tradotta in arabo mercoledì scorso dal Centro studi, analisi e informazioni.

"Possediamo centinaia di testate atomiche e missili che possono raggiungere differenti bersagli nel cuore del continente europeo, compresa Roma", ha detto Karfeld, aggiungendo che la maggior parte delle capitali europee diventerebbero bersagli privilegiati per l'aviazione israeliana.

Lo storico israeliano ha più volte affermato la capacità di Israele di distruggere il mondo intero se esso si sentisse vicino alla fine.

Per quanto riguarda i palestinesi, lo storico Karfeld ha detto che when Israel pursues a specific strategy based on the mass deportation of Palestinians, with the intention to expel them all, without exception, but is just waiting for the right moment to do so.

"Two years ago, only 7-8% of Israelis believed in this solution for the Palestinians, but only two months ago in favor of the percentage rose to 33%. Today, according to a survey by Gallup, the percentage has grown to 55%. "

Karfeld said that Israel must take advantage of every event that could provide a golden opportunity to expel the Palestinians, just as happened in Deyr Yasin massacre in 1948.

Responding to the question "Israel afraid of being considered a rogue state if the Palestinians expelled? "Karfeld replied:" Israel is a state that does not care what others say about him. You must remember what he said former Defense Minister Moshe Dayan: 'Israel must always act like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother. "

Source: http://www.infopal.it/leggi.php?id=13858

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Brazilian Waxing Demo

CASANOVA IN AND CANDIED PANDORO


Yesterday, after an immense effort of strength, I finished reading the book by Laura and Cristina Origone Amis " How to go to bed a woman in 10 moves. " want me to explain why a man-and in particular my person-may have been attracted by a title like that skirt the issue or do we want? Perfect. So let me tell you a little argument 'my bitterness over this pretentious title.

The manual for young Casanova on Sunday had an added value compared to other many of his counterparts: he had been drafted by experts in the field, or two women. This, I confess, has piqued even more my desire to go through. In short, it's like a famous magician had held a seminar on how to reveal his tricks, or even better, as if you had an enemy general sent a letter on how to easily overcome their defenses. Wow!

But nada. A violent fall and noisy to the fiasco.

The authors in 10 chapters, one for each rule, guide us step by step and in a prudent and gradual shift towards the achievement of the prosaic goal: the pleasure between the sheets (if you're lucky, otherwise tra il cambio ed il volante). Tutto ciò dopo un’abbondante introduzione nella quale, nell’alto medioevo del 2010, ci viene svelato che: si, le donne di oggi sono molto più libere e libertine, ed anche loro sono alla ricerca del piacere in quanto tale.

Ma la domanda che viene fuori dopo le prime 30/40 pagine è: per chi diavolo è scritto questo libro? Chi è il referente? Perché le due esperte ci dichiarano da subito che l’uomo a cui si riferisco è il tipico “piacione” da spiaggia, icona della commedia all’italiana, con i suoi modi grossolani , il costumino adamitico, l’aplomb ed il savoir faire di un trucker Valsugana snooty and security that distinguishes tamarri.

Now I wonder if you think a character in this bill will never buy this bon ton of the Latin lover as the arsenal of self-esteem she has. I would not say it would be a humiliation. The natural buyers eager to devour the pages is the shy and introverted that before asking the direction of the bus (which of course already know) a woman, the fixed feet for 25 minutes, just long enough to see it run in the same bus. But in this case our friendly handbook proves useless. Tips such as: do not tell her 'you have cellulite!', Do not try to put a hand under her skirt as soon as you know, not trying at the same time with friends, etc., are not just our case. The fact is that the advice on the approach currently hiding, and they represent only a narrow part of the book. It is, however, that the fleeting moment, the swollen river to cross, there is the awkward turns into a pillar of salt and is expressed as a machine at the toll road. The later is almost always a game played in two, and that the desire to know how to drive. The small errors that can arise in this next phase are often removed from simple curiosity, the (likely) non-familiarity of the same partners and, again, by desire.

Another terrible mistake is the context and particularization. The authors we have two special scenarios in which our protagonist must move: The first is that the meeting with a colleague at work, in the second we are on holiday at the sea and find the beautiful beach. The first, which would seem the most tempting, since most common situation in our daily lives, is almost immediately discarded in favor of the latter. Then, to complete the work, season assuming that the "prey" or girlfriend or maybe even married. And no! It is as if they were printed manuals for the driving school where you teach to lead to an aspiration racer only diesel cars with automatic transmission. There is no space for the generalization of advice given to the versatile use of "strategies" (let's call it that) in the most different and everything is packaged for the statistically unlikely event. The two then try to correct some sloppy shooting another possible scenario, but their simulated conversations in which they delight to read the minds of potential gains (mostly adapting to recommend just the thoughts given, to give a semblance of effectiveness), making repeated references to instantly erase husbands waiting at home for friends and spy.

short, sad to say, but if you had tied your hopes to use what Aldo Busi called "the drug of the poor" are badly fooled. If you prefer to find a compendium of the best rules for use with the fairer sex taken from Sex and the City & Co. or you can buy this book or ask your friend to fifteen. It will definitely more.


gianluca